From the monthly archives: "March 2012"

Holtville Tribune


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Engines from Apollo 11 moon flight found in the Atlantic” was written by Sam Jones and agencies, for The Guardian on Thursday 29th March 2012 17.14 UTC

Nearly 43 years after they thrust the Apollo 11 astronauts moonwards through a blue Florida sky, the mighty engines that helped deliver man to the Sea of Tranquillity have been found in the depths of the Atlantic Ocean.

The five engines, last seen driving the Saturn V rocket free of the Earth on 16 July 1969, were found in a search led by the Amazon chief executive and space enthusiast Jeff Bezos, who hopes to recover at least one.

The engines took 2½ minutes to hurl the rocket 40 miles into the heavens before falling into the ocean. Four days later, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin became the first men to walk on the moon.

Bezos – who credits the Apollo 11 mission with fuelling his passion for science, engineering and exploration – embarked on the salvage mission a year ago after deciding it might be possible “with the right team of undersea pros”.

“I’m excited to report that, using state-of-the-art deep sea sonar, the team has found the Apollo 11 engines lying 14,000 feet below the surface, and we’re making plans to attempt to raise one or more of them from the ocean floor,” Bezos wrote in a breathless blog post on Wednesday.

“We don’t know yet what condition these engines might be in — they hit the ocean at high velocity and have been in salt water for more than 40 years. On the other hand, they’re made of tough stuff, so we’ll see.”

He gave no details about where the engines had been found, or how they had been identified.

But Bezos did make it clear that he was not claiming ownership of the F-1s and said he hoped they would one day be displayed for the public.

“Though they’ve been on the ocean floor for a long time, the engines remain the property of Nasa,” he said. “If we are able to recover one of these F-1 engines that started mankind on its first journey to another heavenly body, I imagine that Nasa would decide to make it available to the Smithsonian for all to see. If we’re able to raise more than one engine, I’ve asked Nasa if they would consider making it available to the excellent Museum of Flight here in Seattle.”

The Amazon founder said the salvage operation was a wholly private affair: “No public funding will be used to attempt to raise the engines.”

Nasa said it hadn’t been formally contacted by Bezos and was waiting for more details.

A spokesman said: “There has always been great interest in artefacts from the early days of space exploration and his announcement only adds to the enthusiasm of those interested in Nasa’s history.”

The sea floor is littered with spent rockets and debris from missions dating back to the dawn of the space age. In 2009, a private company salvaged Gus Grissom’s Mercury capsule, which accidentally sank in the Atlantic after splashdown in 1961. It was restored and displayed at the Kansas Cosmosphere and Space Centre.

Robert “Bob” Biggs, a development engineer who spent almost a decade working on the F-1, reflected on the engine’s sheer power during a Nasa lecture six years ago.

“It took the Apollo launch vehicle, which was 363 feet tall and weighed six million pounds, and threw it downrange 50 miles, threw it up to 40 miles of altitude, at Mach 7,” he said. “It took 2½ minutes to do that and burned 4½ million pounds of propellant – a pretty sizeable task.”

Bezos, who founded his own spaceflight company, Blue Origin, “to enable human access to space at dramatically lower cost and increased reliability”, described the F-1 rocket engine as an enduring technological marvel.

“The F-1 rocket engine is still a modern wonder – 1½ million pounds of thrust, 32 million horsepower, and burning 6,000 pounds of rocket grade kerosene and liquid oxygen every second,” he wrote on his blog. “Those five F-1s burned for just a few minutes, and then plunged back to Earth into the Atlantic Ocean, just as Nasa planned. A few days later, Neil Armstrong stepped onto the moon.”

The Apollo programme, he went on, had exercised a profound influence over his life.

“Nasa is one of the few institutions I know that can inspire five-year-olds,” he said. “It sure inspired me, and with this endeavour, maybe we can inspire a few more youth to invent and explore.”

Boy’s toys

Jeff Bezos is not the first extraordinarily rich individual to harbour a penchant for extreme engineering and exploration. Howard Hughes pushed the aeronautical envelope in the 1930s and 1940s by designing and flying experimental aircraft, including the Hughes H-4 Hercules – better known as the Spruce Goose – which was the largest flying boat ever built. James Cameron, the director of Titanic and The Abyss, is another member of the very rich adventurers’ club. Last week, Cameron became the first person to perform a solo voyage to the oceans’ deepest point– the floor of the seven-mile deep Mariana Trench. Emerging from his 12-tonne, lime green submarine, Deepsea Challenger, the film-maker described the trench as “a very desolate place… My feeling was one of complete isolation from all of humanity”.

Sir Richard Branson – no stranger to perilous endeavours – has also been building his own one-man sub to explore the ocean depths later this year. His Virgin Oceanic deep-diving programme was to have started with a descent to the bottom of the Mariana Trench, but Branson will now pilot his submersible to the Puerto Rico Trench, the deepest point of the Atlantic Ocean.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Holtville Tribune


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Mitt Romney on a roll after Marco Rubio endorsement – US politics live” was written by Jim Newell, for guardian.co.uk on Thursday 29th March 2012 17.12 UTC

Okay, fine, another Scotus take. Here’s Yale constitutional law professor Jack Balkin laying out not just one “limiting principle that justifies the individual mandate but doesn’t give Congress unlimited power under the Commerce Clause,” but three.

1.02pm: Ann Romney will celebrate her birthday at Donald Trump’s apartment in New York City. Here’s the invitation! Attendance only costs $1,000 per person.

12.46pm: Meanwhile, in our beloved national legislature, the House has passed a temporary, 90-day highway and transportation reauthorization bill. It’s now kicked to the Senate, which had already passed a bipartisan two-year reauthorization but now needs to make a decision before funding lapses this weekend.

The New York Times this morning looked at how House obstructionism of funding bills like these, which are critical to contractors and the like, are irritating the same business interests that put House Republicans in power in the 2010 elections:

Big business groups like the Chamber of Commerce spent millions of dollars in 2010 to elect Republican candidates running for the House. The return on investment has not always met expectations.

Even though money for major road and bridge projects is set to run out this weekend, House Republican leaders have struggled all week to round up the votes from recalcitrant conservatives simply to extend it for 90 or even 60 days. A longer-term transportation bill that contractors and the chamber say is vital to the recovery of the construction industry appears hopelessly stalled over costs.

12.20pm: Remember back when Newt Gingrich was touting his plan to fire unionized public school janitors and have poor children clean their own toilets, to learn the value of a buck? Because this former child janitor whom Gingrich encountered at Georgetown University yesterday remembers:

The young man, Hector Cendejas, said that he had worked as a janitor at his own high school and had been offended by Gingrich’s comment.

“For me, it was embarrassing to be a janitor at my own high school. … I was poor. My mom was working super hard. I did not feel empowered by serving my classmates,” Cendejas said. “Why not invest on these kids to work for a law firm?”

He added: “Thank God I had Georgetown to save my butt, you know? … All my friends, they’re pregnant, they’re in gangs, in jail, and we did the same job, working as janitors. So for me, your remark was a little offensive to me.”

Gingrich sparred with the young man, countering that his daughters worked as janitors and had found the job a fruitful one.

“But they come from a wealthy family,” the young man said, to some boos from the crowd.

“I wasn’t wealthy,” Gingrich responded, to applause. “I wasn’t wealthy. You know, I just disagree.”

12.16pm: Rick Santorum will be giving a Major Foreign Policy Address this afternoon at… the headquarters of a jelly bean candy company. Because Ronald Reagan famously enjoyed jelly beans. No, seriously, that’s the reason.

12.11pm: And here is Mitt Romney making fun of the size of Senator John Kerry’s home in 2004.

 

12.03pm: Now that we’ve all had a good night’s sleep after three days of high Supreme Court drama, let’s round up a few more reactions about this week’s health care case.

The Washington Post’s EJ Dionne shreds the conservative justices one by one and reminds liberals of the futility in drifting rightward to accommodate supposed conservative policymaking principles:

Liberals should learn from this display that there is no point in catering to today’s hard-line conservatives. The individual mandate was a conservative idea that President Obama adopted to preserve the private market in health insurance rather than move toward a government-financed, single-payer system. What he got back from conservatives was not gratitude but charges of socialism — for adopting their own proposal.


Rajav Narayan,
a health care policy fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, tries to read the mind of omnipotent swing vote Justice Anthony Kennedy:

However, Justice Kennedy seemed not to be looking for a reason to strike down the law because the federal government would bear blame. Instead, Justice Kennedy seemed more concerned to find a “clear line of accountability so the citizen knows it’s the federal or the state government should be held responsible for the program.” This decision could turn on what Justice Kennedy finds to be proper in his view of federalism.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board, members of which probably all were watching the hearings with big foam hands reading “END SOCIALISM NOW,” tries to explain the fascinating concept that “overturning the whole law would be an act of judicial restraint”:

Mr. Verrilli came closest to a limiting principle—and got some sympathy from Justice Kennedy – when he claimed that everyone will use health care at some point in their lives, so what’s the big deal with making young people pay more earlier?

Even if this were true, it is a deeply radical claim. The government is mandating that everyone buy health insurance specifically, but by this reasoning any economic or personal decisions that touch on health care could be used as a pretext for federal police powers. People who lead healthy lives consume fewer medical services than others, so the government could mandate exercise, a healthy diet, and more.

This is power without limit, which is not what the Constitution provides, or what its framers intended, or what the Supreme Court has ever tolerated. That is why this week’s arguments have been so careful, why they have revised the establishment’s thinking, and why they are so important for the future of American liberty.

And Steve Kornacki at Salon reminds us all that reading the tea leaves might be fun, but it’s impossible to reach any conclusions until the decision is, you know, made.

Audio recordings are now available, so you can judge for yourself whether today really was a “train wreck” for the law. Keep in mind that it’s also possible that all of the justices made up their minds long before today’s arguments, meaning that Verrilli – if he really performed as terribly as firsthand observers are saying – might not have actually blown the case, no matter how badly he did.

The court isn’t expected to rule for months, maybe not until late June. It’s entirely possible that the mandate will be thrown out, but it’s all still guesswork until then.

For more analysis, we highly recommend a trip to SCOTUSblog, which received more traffic in the past three days than it did over the four previous years combined.

11.34am: House minority leader Nancy Pelosi is defending Representative Bobby Rush, who was kicked off of the House floor yesterday for wearing a hoodie in honor of slain Trayvon Martin. This violated the very crucial rule against wearing “hats” on the House floor.

10.52am: Senator Marco Rubio tells the Daily Caller’s Matt Lewis that the event that sparked his endorsement of Mitt Romney was President Obama’s “hot mic gaffe” with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev this week. The guy can barely sleep, just thinking about how Obama is in cahoots with the Russians:

“It’s been weighing on my mind all week,” he said. “I’ve never thought about this as a political calculation,” Rubio said of his endorsement. “I’m just sitting back here and watching a president that just got back from overseas — where he told the Russian president to work with him and give him space so he can be more flexible if he gets re-elected.”

10.38am: Rick Santorum is using the last days of his campaign to teach youths important life lessons: friends don’t let friends use pink balls.

 

 

10.27am: Here, via Jewish Journal, is an interesting interview with Sheldon Adelson, the Las Vegas casino magnate worth $21 billion who’s donated tens of millions of dollars to Newt Gingrich’s Super PAC and almost exclusively extended his presidential run months beyond its natural expiration date. He shares his reasons for supporting Gingrich over the others – Newt’s a bold decision maker (Newt must love hearing this) while Santorum is “too social” and Mitt Romney never answers any of his questions.

But Adelson does finally acknowledge the obvious: “Newt’s at the end of his line.”

 

10.00am: Welcome to another day of political liveblogging! This is Jim Newell from Washington, bringing you today’s latest, less Supreme Court-centric news. Mitt Romney, fresh off of last night’s big endorsement from senator and assumed vice presidential nominee Marco Rubio, will wrap up another in-person endorsement today from former President George HW Bush. The end of the line is here, and ranks are closing. Meanwhile, Rick Santorum is talking about how good he is at sports.

Here’s Ryan Devereaux’s summary of where we are right now.

Florida senator Marco Rubio has endorsed Republican frontrunner Mitt Romney is his bid to be the GOP’s presidential candidate. Viewed as a rising star with future presidential potential himself, Rubio’s endorsement was one of the most sought-after in the Republican party. “I am endorsing Mitt Romney and the reason why is not only is he going to be the Republican nominee but he offers at this point such a stark contrast to the president’s record,” Rubio said on Fox Wednesday night.

Texas congressman Ron Paul has weighed in on the Trayvon Martin case. Speaking to a crowd in College Park, Maryland, Paul said, “I think it deserves attention, I have questions in my mind, but I haven’t heard all the answers that are probably there.” Paul added, “I have to say, personally, I have my concerns about it, it doesn’t look like its going to be a slam dunk for anybody I guess.”

Rick Santorum revealed his opposition to pink bowling balls on Wednesday. During an appearance at a Wisconsin bowling alley the former senator heroically intervened when a male member of a group of college Republicans nearly made the life altering mistake of rolling a neon pink bowling ball down the lane. “Friends don’t let friends use pink balls,” Santorum declared.

Shockingly, Mitt Romney is getting flak for a comment he made that suggests he is an out of touch rich guy. In an interview with Milwaukee’s Journal Sentinel, Romney relayed the “humorous” story of the time his father closed a Michigan auto factory and as a result upset people (Ha!). Romney described to the paper how back when his father, George Romney, was president of American Motors he shut down a factory in Michigan and moved it to Wisconsin. “Later he decided to run for governor of Michigan, and so you can imagine that having closed the factory and moved all the production to Wisconsin was a very sensitive issue to him, for his campaign,” Romney explained. When Romney’s dad would participate in parades, the marching band apparently only knew how to play the Wisconsin fight song. Being the living embodiment of empathy that he is, Romney laughed and pointed out, “my dad’s political people would jump up and down and try to get them to stop, because they didn’t want people in Michigan to be reminded that my dad had moved production to Wisconsin.” How silly!

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Holtville Tribune


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Spanish strike: arrests and vandalism in Barcelona – video” was written by , for guardian.co.uk on Thursday 29th March 2012 17.11 UTC

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

 

Holtville Tribune


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Panic-buying rumours fuel shortages, shutdowns and fights” was written by Peter Walker and Shiv Malik, for The Guardian on Thursday 29th March 2012 17.10 UTC

The effect managed to be both counter-intuitive and almost wearily predictable: the more ministers, police and motoring groups insisted that there was no need to panic, the longer and more fractious the fuel queues became.

After sales of petrol were more than 80% higher than usual on Wednesday, queues began forming at some filling stations by 8am on Thursday, just as the roads minister, Mike Penning, appeared on Radio 4 to reiterate the official advice ahead of a possible tanker drivers’ strike: if you’re driving past a garage then take the opportunity to fill up.

All very well, but as testified by an ever-growing stream of local news reports, tweets and texted photos of snaking lines of cars, not so useful if every driver apparently tries to do so at the same time.

Some of the earlier queues were spotted in Hartlepool, with long lines soon forming at the forecourts operated by Morrisons, Tesco and Asda. Similar scenes were repeated in other locations.

The scale of the problem became apparent at midday when Dorset police announced they had been forced to ask petrol stations to close for a period as queues were causing traffic disruption on adjoining roads.

“The actions of some motorists in queuing irresponsibly at petrol stations is causing danger to other road users,” said Chief Inspector Nick Maton. “There is no disruption to the fuel supply in the UK and members of the public should not panic buy.” Five petrol stations – four around Bournemouth and one in Weymouth – were shut down until congestion eased.

Soon afterwards another police force, Hampshire, felt obliged to issue a statement pointing out that the Unite union, representing tanker drivers, was still in talks with haulage firms and that a strike was by no means inevitable, let alone imminent.

“There is currently no problem with fuel supplies in Hampshire and therefore we would urge all motorists to continue as normal with their fuel purchases,” a spokeswoman said. “Spurious rumours that are being spread online and through other mediums clearly have the potential to engender panic-buying so it is in danger of becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy when there really isn’t an issue at this current time.”

However, such was the self-fulfilling nature of events that what might have started out as “spurious rumours” on social media soon became well-documented facts, disseminated via the same means. Within a couple of hours a Twitter search for “garage closed” brought dozens of 140 character-long tales of woe from locations including South Wales, Milton Keynes, Taunton, Scarborough and London’s North Circular road. Some added notes of disbelief that such seemingly unnecessary panic could spread so quickly. “Nice work, Mr Cameron,” added one.

The effects were felt elsewhere in the economy. Even as ministers rescinded the advice of Francis Maude, the cabinet office minister, for motorists to keep “a bit of extra fuel in a jerrycan in the garage” after fire officers expressed alarm, the motor accessories chain Halfords reported a 225% increase in sales of fuel containers.

Official voices weighed in again to urge calm, some blaming the government for the chaos.

The Petrol Retailers Association, which represents around 5,500 garages, said: “This is exactly what we didn’t want – people panic-buying. Deliveries are still being made to garages and we are advising people to continue with their normal buying habits.”

The president of the AA, Edmund King, said: “We now have self-inflicted shortages due to poor advice about topping up the tank and hoarding in jerrycans. This in turn has led to localised shortages, queues and some profiteering at the pumps.

“Theoretically if 30 million cars with half-full tanks are advised to fill up over 24 hours, this means that 750 million litres of fuel would be sold, whereas average sales over 24 hours would be 90 million litres. Hence the top-up advice means that demand for fuel has increased more than seven-fold. So it is no surprise that the ‘top-up’ advice has led to shortages.”

Assistant Chief Constable Charlie Hall, in charge of industrial disputes for the Association of Chief Police Officers, warned: “We would encourage the owners of filling stations to ensure that their forecourts are orderly and safe. The police may take action where queues are hazardous and pose a danger to the safety of the public.”

Yet seemingly little changed, with one garage in Harrogate, North Yorkshire, running dry by 11.30am. Reports from South Wales recounted one village petrol station only selling fuel “to known customers” while some angry drivers reported sudden and mysterious price rises.

As the afternoon went on another, equally predictable phenomenon started to emerge. In mid-afternoon, one woman in Berkshire tweeted: “Seriously idiots stop panic buying petrol, I genuinely need petrol and there is none, just saw an actual fight on the forecourt!”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

SAN DIEGO – The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) will begin work Monday on a $15 million project to repave a 10-mile section of highway on Interstate 8 (I-8) from the San Diego-Imperial county line to State Route 98 (SR-98).   Highway lane, ramp and connector closures are scheduled daily, including weekends, between 6 in the morning and 8 in the evening through mid-July.

Work will alternate between the westbound and eastbound directions. Highway construction crews will initially close one westbound lane on I-8 and the connector from westbound SR-98 to westbound I-8.  Eastbound work will close one eastbound lane on I-8 and the connector from eastbound I-8 to eastbound SR-98.  

Detours will be provided during connector closures and shuttle service will transport bicyclists and their equipment when the shoulders are closed on I-8.

No significant traffic delays are expected during construction.

For information about this and other closures, follow SDCaltrans on Twitter at www.twitter.com/SDCaltrans.